From: Comparing antithyroid drugs vs. radioactive iodine in paediatric Graves’ disease: literature review
Study Reference | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Namwongprom et al. [26] 2021 | • There are no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients recruited (excluding 24 h I-131 uptake and RI status), meaning the effects of confounding factors are minimised • Appropriate comparison of data using statistical analysis tests (Sample T Test and Kruskal-Wallis H test) • Clearly defined outcome | • Small sample size of 32 patients • All patients were recruited from a single institute and are therefore likely to be susceptible to selection bias. • Study design is retrospective and is thus susceptible. • No statistical significance or confidence intervals are reported for any outcomes. • All cases had previously taken ATD which may affect the outcome of radioactive iodine therapy |
H Lee et al. [27] 2021 | • The efficacy and adverse effects of a wide variety of ATD dosages were explored. • Relationship between dose of ATD and frequency of adverse events are reported along with statistical significance. • Clearly defined outcome • Continuous variable differences were compared with the post hoc Tukey tests | • Small sample size of 99 patients • Non-randomised allocation of patients, introducing the effect of confounding factors. • Cases were obtained from only one hospital which may not be representative of the entire population, introducing selection bias |
Song et al. [28] 2021 | • The largest sample size of 195 of all primary studies included. • Clearly defined exclusion criteria • A lengthy mean treatment duration of 4.7 +/- 3.4 years • Clearly defined definition of remission • Use of Cox regression model to adjust for confounding at analysis stage | • Over the study period, 28.3% of patients were lost to follow-up. • Predictors of remission could not be recognised due to inadequate sample size. |
Mizokami et al. [29] 2020 | • Median follow-up period of 95 months • Statistical analyses performed using the Mann- Whitney U test or Pearson’s chi square test. • Accurate assessment of thyroid volumes with the use of ultrasonography | • Small sample size of 117 patients, with concurrent loss to follow-up of 25.6% of patients • Only a maximal limit of 13.5 mCi of I-131 can be administered to outpatients in Japan, which means activity of I-131 uptake in patients with large goitres is difficult to interpret. • Variations of TSH levels are likely to have affected thyroid volumes. • Limited knowledge of the effect of confounding variables due to an absence of a baseline characteristics table |